Sample: before vs. after (attachability)
From scattered evidence to audit-ready Evidence Pack
Situation
In many organizations, Shadow AI visibility is low and evidence is scattered across tools and teams. Auditors then face repeated re-requests and long prep cycles because deliverables are not standardized or integrity-checked.
Before vs. after (what changes)
Before: No single pack attachable to working papers; who-used-what-when is hard to reconstruct from logs. After (Evidence Pack): One coherent pack—AI-BOM, Change Ledger, Evidence Bundle (manifest, hashes, signatures) per AIMO Standard—with validator runs so auditors can verify integrity and non-repudiation.
Action (how we get there)
We deliver an Evidence Pack using network/security logs and basic policy docs; human review and validator runs are part of the workflow. Scope and timeline (e.g. 2–4 weeks for first pack) depend on data availability.
What auditors care about
- Integrity checks — Evidence Bundle with hashes/signatures and validator; non-repudiation support.
- Repeatable workflow — Same structure every time; easier to scope and price for your firm.
- Responsibility boundary — AIMO = proof generation; audit firm = assurance conclusion and client relationship.